- Silverfast scanning software full#
- Silverfast scanning software pro#
- Silverfast scanning software software#
- Silverfast scanning software plus#
SilverFast HDR (imaging software): 48Bit/64Bit HDRi image processing, RAW data processing, PhotoShop obsolete
Silverfast scanning software software#
SilverFast SE / Ai (scanner software): THE scanner software per se, for perfect scans.
Silverfast scanning software full#
LaserSoft Imaging offers individually adjusted solutions for hundreds of flatbed scanners, film scanners and digital cameras untapping the full potential of each device.
SilverFast software for scanners, digital cameras, print and image processing brings the best out of all devices.
Silverfast scanning software pro#
SilverFast SE for beginners, SilverFast Ai for advanced users and SilverFast Pro Studio for experts: scanner and imaging software for any needs. But the scans come out great.SilverFast SE / Ai 6.6 Scanner Software scores with improved features: 64bit HDRi, Multi-Exposure, iSRD, IT8 Scanner Calibration and ICC Printer Calibration, Kodachrome Features, Auto-Frame, Auto-Sharpening, Gamma-Optimization, NegaFix, Movies for beginners and more. If you want the ME (multi exposure) feature, you actually need it as an extra feature to Ai Studio.Ī last disclaimer: Their forum is crap. Silverfast Ai has one more, significant, addition: Scanner calibration using a calibration target (paper for flatbed, slides for film scanners). Photoshop can convert them in a batch action, though. Also, the image profile embedded in the 48 Bit images isn't a generic profile. Not a problem for me as I didn't want those. And you must manually select output Gamma 2.2. What you won't find on their web pages is that, if you scan to 48 Bit, all the fancy and mighty controls are in yet another piece of software, called HDR studio (or so). So, the ME feature with 48 Bit output is what I wanted. I consider a scanned image and a RAW image to be equivalent whereas SilverFast tries to cover the entire workflow to JPG.
Silverfast scanning software plus#
Silverfast SE Plus with ME has some fancy and mighty controls but actually, I prefer to do all this stuff within Lightroom. I got the ME because this appears to be the most significant addition on top of the Nikon Coolscan software which isn't bad either. I have Silverfast SE Plus with ME (multi exposure). at the cost of the time for multiple exposures of courseĪi 6.6 - $119 - this has the fancier controls and comes customized for the 4490, while the SE versions appear to be generic. SE Plus is $104 - this adds 'multi exposure' which should increase dynamic range and reduce scan noise. I'm considering buying some better software for my Epson 4490 than came in the box, specifically Silverfast.īut their pricing and product line is pretty confusing. The rarely quoted density range is what you're really interested in (Dmax minus Dmin) for single pass scanning.īut with Multi-Exposure you can tap into that Dmax to get shadow detail without sacrificing highlight detail, which can be captured on a second pass exposed just for them. Scanner manufacturers are fond of quoting Dmax numbers (especially above 4.0), for their units but they don't easily confess that they've cranked up exposure so much to get that Dmax that the highlights are blown out.
LaserSoft discovered that by scanning once for highlights and once for shadows (at two different exposures that is) and then combining the two scans into one high density range image, it was able to 1) reduce noise while 2) revealing shadow detail and 3) still retain highlight detail. At PMA we discussed the feature with several scanner manufacturers who were universally delighted with it. "The most exciting development in this release, however, is the new multi-exposure option. I suppose I can download the eval copies of each to see for myslef I saw this in the Digital Imaging review of Silverfast, now it sure sounds like the SE Plus has something unique vs. I should have mentioned that the scanning I am doing is 35mm and 120 film Do you have any particular quality advantage in mind? and could still end up with VueScan, the cost certainly is nice.
0 kommentar(er)
